This will have to be a series of articles as I do not have time to sit and write something that undoubtedly will be as long as the Heath Care Bill. All of President Obama’s executive orders are list in alphabetical order on this site, http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/obama-subjects.html This series will take a look at all of the Executive Orders the POTUS has signed and try simplify, put them in standard English and reviewed them for their Constitutionality. This series will focus on the Executive Orders that are unconstitutional or are highly suspect for the reason of writing such an Executive Order
E.O. 13489 Presidential Records. This is the very first executive if it is Constitutional it shouldn’t be E.O. 13489 Presidential Records Was Signed by Obama to prevent any records about his civilian life being made public. Why would the POTUS want to hide what school he went to, or show his collage loans papers or his passport records and why would he spend over 2 million dollars fighting the release of the most basic paperwork concerning his life in the U.S.
E.O.13494 Economy in Government Contracts. Sounds good to me, but what does it say? It says that any and all activities related to organizing for unions by any contractor doing Business with the government will be deem as an allowable cost and charged to the taxpayer thing listed as allowable in Section 4 (a) preparing and distributing materials. (b) Hiring or consulting legal counsel or consultants. (c) Attending meetings (including paying the salaries of the attendees at meetings held for this purpose); and (d) planning or conducting activities by managers, supervisors or union representatives during working hours.
If I understand this the taxpayers are forced to pay for people previously not unionized to attempt to unionize. Which includes all the legal fees and pamphlets and fliers and signs and anything else that the unions said was a cost of unionizing. Nowhere in the constitution does it say taxpayer should pay for people to unionize. Unconstitutional. An afterthought just as I was getting ready to post this the RICO Act popped into my mind If the mafia can be charged under RICO for making people hire a certain garbage collection firm why can’t the President be charged for make the companies that do business with the Government hire Unionized workers at most likely A hire wage rate and what does the company do with its long time workers????Fire them and make us pay for their unemployment pay for their unemployment. It can also be considered bid rigging all these added costs make it harder for the competition
E.O.13495 Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts is an extension of E.O. 13494 which says now that the taxpayers have paid to unionize these people if the contract with the government is lost to another company the new company must hire the people from the old company no matter how unsuitable their work is. No company in America can be told by the government which people to hire. Unconstitutional.
Executive Order 13497 Revocation of Certain Executive Orders Concerning Regulatory Planning and Review This E.O. seems to get rid minor things like agencies looking for future market problem and agencies have to give a cost benefit analysis also anything that would affect the economy adversely by 100 million or more, rules and regulation revues, minor the like that. Not Unconstitutional but why take away such safeguards.
Executive Order 13498 Amendments to Executive Order 13199 and Establishment of the President's Advisory Council for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. This E.O. may be the first of many this inquiry may find. In this case we have 1 Unconstitutional E.O. replacing another. In this case we the giving money to the church to run programs that are much the same in service as a wide range of other programs the government already runs, in an attempt to make it more palatable so the progressives can dump money into their far left agenda being pushed so called community organizations such as ACORN. Yes ACORN is still around and is pushing to regain millions of your tax dollars to push the Progressive ideology.
If they both accomplish the same thing why the change? In E.O. 13199 it states “The delivery of social services must be result orientated and should value the bedrock principles of pluralism, nondiscrimination, even handedness and neutrality. In E.O. 13498 the last statement is stricken and replaced with words as follows; “guaranteeing equal protection of the laws and the free exercise of religion and forbidding the establishment of religion. The Federal Government must insure that organizations receiving federal money achieve measureable in furtherance or valid public proposes.”
This change in section one almost sounds like they are trying to set up a Communist type state in the inner city which most of these so called “Community organizations are located. “Forbidding the establishment of religion” that statement alone sounds ominous. These programs are nothing but a giant vote buy fraud perpetuated on the American people.
Just looking at the first 10 of President Obama’s Executive Orders Has opened my eyes to the huge extent to which the American people are being victimized by their own government and the President. How long has this been going on? How many Presidents have used the Executive Order to victimize the American people? How much money has been stolen from the American people by their own government? I do not have the answer to those questions yet but I will try to get them as should all those that read this series.
It is not just the President involved in this unending fraud; it is every elected official in government that is allowing this to happen. Why? Best guess is don’t rock the Democrats boat and they won’t rock the Republicans boat is my only guess.
No comments:
Post a Comment